|
|
|
MALAYSIA AIRLINES Customer Reviews and Passenger Trip Reports |
|
|
|
|
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 17 November 2009 by K Lim (Malaysia)
| |
Trip Rating : 8/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
KUL-LHR B747-400 on a full flight. Plane looks rather old but clean. Excellent seat pitch.
Been a while since I last flew MH on long haul. Cost cutting measures could be seen throughout
the flight - no more towels and amenities in the toilets. Inflight entertainment decent (but
lagging behind SQ). Food excellent (better than SQ), but surprised that coffee/tea after meals
only served upon request. What made the flight outstanding was cabin crew. They were
courteous, efficient, and made up for the slightly inferior cabin products compared to other
5-star carriers.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 15 November 2009 by Andre Ruefenacht (Switzerland)
| |
Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
First |
SYD-KUL. Perfect service, cabin clean and in a good condition. Food could be better, beverages
excellent, seat and bed very comfortable. Crew very pleasant.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 3 November 2009 by A Scheel (Germany)
| |
Trip Rating : 10/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Business |
FRA-KUL-MNL-KUL-FRA in Economy class. Check-in line was quite long in FRA. FRA-KUL flight was
100% booked. Legspace very decent for a 12 hour-flight, same applies to food & drinks. Crew
was very attentive. IFE was good, with individual screens. No amenity kit, but eyemask on
request. KUL-MNL 30% full, very friendly & capable crew. Return flight same experience.
Would definitely fly with MH again. Excellent value for money.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 29 October 2009 by R Nair (Malaysia)
| |
Trip Rating : 6/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Business |
KUL-MEL-KUL in Business class on B777-200. Lounge in KLIA rather crowded, food selection
limited and staff somewhat disinterested Boarding was fast, greeted by crew and shown to
seat. Pre-flight drink offered, food requests noted, lots of smiles etc. Then it started to go
downhill. Food was served quickly and I felt as though I was rushed through my meal. My plate
of satay was taken away from under me! The crew then disappeared and were not seen for a few
hours, although they answered the call bell promptly. At breakfast, coffee was served in cheap
looking mugs and was weak. When I asked for a stronger cup of coffee, I was told "this is how
we make it". Amenity bag tacky, seats not completely lie flat. Overall the flight was not
worth the money paid - at no point was anyone rude but just indifferent and lacking service
skills. The product has gone down in standard compared to a few years ago.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 24 October 2009 by G Hu (USA)
| |
Trip Rating : 8/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
LAX-TPE return in economy. Excellent value for money, as my wife and I had tickets through an
internet special. Food above average, and flight attendants extremely attentive. Return
flight was delayed due to Philippine storm activity.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 22 October 2009 by Cheng Long (Australia)
| |
Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
Perth - KL - Narita return. All flights on time. The food was superb, 3 choices of food to and
from Narita. Had seafood on both flights - delicious. Frequent drink service with several
choices. All flights on Boeing 772. Aircraft still ok but not new. AVOD with plenty of
choices. Good seat recline on economy.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 19 October 2009 by John Lynn (UK)
| |
Trip Rating : 7/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
LHR-KLIA-Yogyakarta-Denpasar Bali return. LHR to KL - check in at LHR was by Alitalia -
attempted online check in 24 hours before - not allowed access. On checking in at terminal 3 ,
three hours before flight, myself and partner were not given seats together - told by a rather
indifferent Alitalia check in person that as we were a group booking we were allocated a block
booking and it was up to us to change seats with others in the party - statement incorrect as
all 17 of us were scattered throughout the 747. Pre ordered veg meals only arrived twice in
four flights - and then only after having to request them on boarding and they would "see what
they could do" - pointed to my confirmed e ticket which stated VGML on all segments. LHR-KUL
and KUL-LHR good on demand IFE seatback with excellent choice. KUL to Java and Bali to KUL
B737-300 no IFE and rather elderly aircraft and seats. They ran out of red wine and the meal
selection after row 6, it was chicken like it or dont like it - but staff apologetic. Delayed
1 hour out of LHR and 2 hrs out of Bali - very little info given at Bali regarding delay but
made to go to gate and wait. Made for a very tight connection and a sprint the length of KUL
airport to the LHR flight. Cabin crew excellent on all legs - many water runs during the
night flight home, always in the aisles asking anyone awake if they wanted anything. In all a
little disappointing for a 5 star airline (Alitalia check in and delays), but cabin crew and
IFE made up for it to a degree.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 14 October 2009 by P Vincent (Australia)
| |
Trip Rating : 6/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
MEL-KUL-CDG economy. MEL-KUL crew fed us and them disappeared. KUL-Paris leg they were about
more and seemed more attentive. Because I have a disability, I booked seat 11J over and back.
This meant I had extra leg room and was able to access the Business class toilet, which was
closer for me than walking down the back. The staff on both legs were very helpful and
attentive. On arrival in Paris my wheelchair had been damaged during the flight, and Malaysia
Airlines were very good and accepted responsibility.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 13 October 2009 by Alan Ho (Singapore)
| |
Trip Rating : 6/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
Singapore-Kuala Lumpur-Tokyo return. KL-Tokyo catering poor, entertainment choice limited,
and cabin service rush. Tokyo-KL Japanese crew serving my aisle is thoughtful and smily, but
food portion is extra small! You can also see some cost cutting like no more hot towels
welcome drink and peanuts. But to be fair now their fares are more competitive and affordable
when compare to the past.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 13 October 2009 by Anthony Stekelenburg (New Zealand)
| |
Trip Rating : 10/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Business |
AKL-KUL-HKT and return. Got a very good fare on this flight and was very impressed. 777 from
AKL to KUL. Charming crew who were witty and warm. The satay course is always something to
look forward to and a perfect quick meal for those who want to sleep. The cabin was only half
full and the pro-active crew were obviously bored and talked me into a mid flight snack of
prawn noodle soup which was excellent. Seat was comfy for a day flight and just ok for the
night sector KUL-AKL. KUL-HKT on 737 and while an older aircraft with no IFE, it was
absolutely fine for the quick 1 hour flight. All flights on time or early. Boarding at KUL
is great with the lounge staff waiting till the last moment to announce the flight, which
meant no queues at the gate. We literally stepped on board, the doors were shut and we were
away. Perfect. It's obviously the crew who make this airline a five star. I just wish they
would install true flat seats and give noise cancelling headphones to premium passengers.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 12 October 2009 by Steven Cao (China)
| |
Trip Rating : 5/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
PVG-KUL economy return on old A330. Waited 40 minutes for Checked in at Shanghai Pudong
Airport then 30 minutes for baggage at KL Airport. No AVOD for 5 hrs flight, not enough news
papers and magazine. Crew friendly but food was not good.
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 12 October 2009 by G Lim (Singapore)
| |
Trip Rating : 7/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
EWR-ARN-KUL in economy class. Equipment was an old B744. Legroom was adequate and the footrest
was handy. However seat width left a little to be desired. The inflatable lumbar support in
the seatback sort of made up for it. Inflight catering was superb and I was certainly well fed
even on a long flight like this (I had four meals, lots of drink services, and a 'midnight'
snack). Flight attendants (both crew sets) were cheerful and courteous. Overall a good flight
- better if the product was upgraded. (NB: this flight has been suspended since Oct 1).
MALAYSIA AIRLINES customer review : 10 October 2009 by P Knight (Vietnam)
| |
Trip Rating : 8/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: |
Economy |
SGN-KUL-SGN in economy. Flight to KUL on time and full. Plane an old 737-400 and looked and
felt its age, no inflight entertainment, so felt like a budget airline. Cabin crew were
friendly enough, but didn't respond well to simple requests, like asking for extra napkins.
Food on flights was a choice of satay chicken or beef with fried rice. It was very tasty, but
a bit spicy for our young children. Ordered kids meals on return flight and my wife pre-booked
the non-spicy option and this was much better. Would advise others to do same if you don't
feel like something spicy on a plane. Transfers to and from the centre of KL were a dream, but
not quite as good as Hong Kong. KLIA Ekspres was great and very competitively priced. Check-in
at KL Sentral Station was fast and efficient. If anything, the only disappointments were the
lack of inflight entertainment on the old aircraft and KL airport - there's nothing to do if
your flight leaves from the main terminal (ie: not the satellite terminal). Only food
available to eat was duty free chocolate or hot dogs - give me Changi Airport any day. The
real bonus was the price of the flights and the convenient time that they left.
|
PAGE:
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 | |
|
If you experience any problems submitting comments on the above link, please use our general Feedback Page |
|