|
|
|
TAM AIRLINES Customer Reviews and Passenger Trip Reports |
|
|
|
|
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 20 March 2010 by P Meier (Spain)
| |
Trip Rating : 8/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
Saõ Paulo (GRU) - Foz do Iguaçu in Economy. I booked one week in advance online and got an
excellent price. The plane was new, seat confortable, seat pitch small. Inflight service very
friendly. On a short 1h30 leg a hot sandwich is served and drinks are offered twice. Cabin
could be cleaned better, there was some rubbish left from the previous passengers. Overall,
good value for money.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 17 March 2010 by J Highfield (USA)
| |
Trip Rating : 0/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
This was my first international flight with TAM. When we arrived in Miami 4 hours before our
flight we were told we had no seats and we were stand by customers. After about 30 minutes
and a few phone calls to TAM's office in Brazil supposedly everything was OK. When it was
time to board we were again told we didn't have seats on the flight? Ok so after some time (&
more calls) we did get on the plane. When we went to board our plane from Sao Paulo to Rio we
were again told we didn't have seats. After some time we were given seats. The return flight
direct from Rio to Miami was an even worse mess. I called the morning of the flight to
confirm our seats so we wouldn't have the same problem as before. TAM then notified us our
flight time had changed (good thing I called). So we got to the airport to find the board
saying our flight was delayed a minimum 30 minutes. OK fine, well as the time nears there was
no plane. We were told our plane had AC problems. Well hours went by with no food or drinks
nothing available in the part of the airport we were held hostage in. TAM personnel at the
airport acted like they owed no explanation as to what was going on. There were old people in
wheel chairs & families with very young children TAM simply didn't care. We were told lie
after lie as to what was delaying us. At one point they even told us they didn't have a crew
for our plane because the crew didn't show up, really? Four hours late we boarded the plane.
Ok so we all think great we are about to leave, not a chance. We were forced to sit another 4
hours plus in the plane with no AC. It was only 100F earlier in the day in Rio, just to give
you an idea how hot and humid it was. During the time we were sitting some of the passengers
got very upset started to call the Federal Police. They were allowed to get off the plane.
Well that meant we had to wait for the TAM to completely unload and reload the luggage. Our
plane ended up leaving after 5am. TAM was very rude and never offered any compensation. I
would look into other options before choosing TAM.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 16 March 2010 by James Walter (UK)
| |
Trip Rating : 0/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
Sao Paulo to Campo Grande. In the air, TAM is basic. The seats are small, and there is only
economy class, even if you have booked and paid for a business ticket. But on the ground, TAM
is awful and can take even a short flight and make an ordeal out of it. My flight was hours
delayed for no reason that was disclosed. The airline was obviously scrambling, and the
departure gate changed twice but that was never updated on the airport video screens, which
suggested the flight had departed already when clearly it had not. There was one announcement
for the second gate change (but what about the first?) in Portuguese only, over a scratchy PA
system. To further confuse matters at the new departure gate the sign read "Brasilia", which
definitely was not the destination. Imagine a sea of confused foreigners and grumpy
Brazilians and that is pretty accurate. Probably because of the gate changes my bags went
missing for a day. It's amateur hour over at TAM - except the hour is several years along
already, and they never seem to improve. It's really a dreadful airline.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 9 March 2010 by M Nelson (USA)
| |
Trip Rating : 0/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
I have never encountered an airline as unprofessional and careless as TAM. The planes are OK,
e flight attendants are charming but on the ground there's absolute chaos. Nobody knows who is
supposed to do what. Two days ago I was coming from earthquake stricken Chile to wait in Rio
de Janeiro for eleven hours for my last flight to Miami. In Rio I was sent here and there to
receive my ticket. It wasn't until eight hours later that after much fighting I was extended a
piece of paper much like a receipt that served as my boarding pass. The treatment was
deplorable and I was not alone in these saga. Other passengers from other countries and
different destinations were my ordeal partners. So I finally arrived to Miami only to find
that my suitcase was lost. The people on the ground, after the style of their compatriots in
Rio and Sao Paulo tried to dismiss me without giving me any help.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 26 February 2010 by Craig Viana (USA)
| |
Trip Rating : 0/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
Internal flights BSB-GRU-FLN. What should have been about a 5 hour flight ended up being more
like 16 hours, with lost luggage and zero compensation. The first flight was late, but TAM
said the connecting flight to FLN would be held for us. But that was not the truth, and about
half a dozen passengers failed to connect. The next flight to FLN was full, so we had to stay
the night in GRU, which meant we needed our luggage back. TAM, however, lost track of the
luggage, so we had nothing. Nobody spoke English, even at the hub in Sao Paulo. We got a
hotel, but only after much arguing in a foreign language. We got a flight the next morning,
but guess what, still no luggage. Let's just say this airline is incompetent, not truthful, and stinks.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 6 February 2010 by A Sismondi (Italy)
| |
Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Business |
A great 12-hour flight Milan to San Paulo return, great service, meal and a good price. The
flight attendants spoke English and Portuguese and some of them were also fluent in Italian.
All announcements in Portuguese, English and Italian. Cabin crew nice.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 6 February 2010 by Steven Koenig (Brazil)
| |
Trip Rating : 4/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
FOR-GRU and GIG-FOR. Had to fly to Sao Paulo to catch a Continental Airlines flight to the
U.S. Continental routed us through Rio on the return. We paid for Business-First on
Continental, but TAM has only one class on domestic flights. TAM is an average Brazilian
airline. I'd rate it as about the same in comfort and service as Gol - sometimes one is
cheaper, sometimes the other. You do usually get drinks, including beer, and either a snack
or a small, hot ham and cheese sandwich (on a roll). TAM is a code share partner with United
and has reportedly been about to join the Star Alliance for several months. Their phone
service is lousy. Web sites don't accommodate multi-leg flights (eg. flying to one place,
back from another). You need to hunt for TAM's international sites to get anything in order
than Portuguese. Flights in Brazil are generally higher cost than those of equivalent
distance in the US, but you can save a lot of money if you find a special (or use an air
pass).
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 24 January 2010 by Rathin Roy (Brazil)
| |
Trip Rating : 3/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Business |
I recently moved to Brazil and since taken several TAM domestic and international flights. Be
very careful when you use this airline when it joins Star alliance. It is not up to standards
on reservations, connectivity, English etc. It is friendly enough but thats about it. Sao
Paulo hub is a dump. Most flight attendants do not speak English, and almost none of the
ground crew do except, for some odd reason, in Curitiba. The announcement boards at Brazilian
airports are misleading moving from Go to Gate to Flight closed in a matter to 60 seconds
sometimes. The business Class international product is good though the lounge in Sao Paolo is
bizzaare. Poor drinks and food, Crowded and standing room only evenings but nevertheless a
grand piano in the middle being plonked on through the chaos. If you need to connect from
Brasilia or anywhere else then it is a true nightmare, they cannot check baggage through or
provide baggage drop or boarding passes if you are connecting from any other airline
(including Star Alliance) to TAM as of now and given the lack of trained and language literate
ground personnel I cannot see how this will change. Even safety announcements are only in
Portuguese, contrary to Star Alliance rules. So be very, very careful when you use this
airline.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 20 January 2010 by Bjorn Lundbo (Norway)
| |
Trip Rating : 6/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
CDG-GIG-CDG. Outbound leg was in one of their older A332s. Small and poor quality LCD's, but
the IFE was upgraded with new 3D animated maps which was a treat. Seated on window row which
is enjoyable on TAM A330-200 with 2-4-2 layout. Return trip almost 2 hrs delayed - as usual no
info given from indifferent TAM ground crew. was in one of their new A330-200 which is a good
product. Low noise, comfy seats with large high quality LCDs. TAM in general serve pretty
average meals, and are not up to AF standard which is their main competitor on this route,
although I do prefer TAMs cabin service to AF.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 19 January 2010 by Adam Bentley (UK)
| |
Trip Rating : 3/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
London (LHR) to Buenos Aires (EZE) return via Sao Paulo (GRU) and return. TAM are clearly
cheaper than everyone else - but, seats uncomfortable and cramped and not good enough for
12.5 - 15 hours of long haul flying. Both of us limped from the aircraft at the end of the
LHR-GRU sector with no feeling in our upper legs! Flight attendants pleasant enough but
service was laid back, Brazilian style - not focused on efficiency and passenger comfort; for
example there was no cabin service / refreshments offered overnight after the evening meal
service had completed. Food a plus point; definitely better than some other competitors
However long haul flying is all about seating comfort and for this reason, we would not fly
with them again. Even economy class passengers are paying the best part of £800 each for a
return ticket and they deserve to have some seating comfort - LAN manage it, so why cant TAM?
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 8 January 2010 by A Ilha (Canada)
| |
Trip Rating : 0/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
BSB-YYZ via GRU. All our flights were booked on TAM, with TAM flight numbers and a TAM
ticket. However, TAM could not check the baggage for the entire journey, supposedly because
one of their flights was actually operated by Air Canada. Even the supervisor in BSB was
ignorant of the fact that, of course, TAM can check a bag to its final destination, regardless
of what carrier operates a flight (and this is especially true when the flight has a TAM
flight number). TAM staff also did not speak English or French. We had to settle to check
our bags to GRU only, but because the TAM flight left BSB late and arrived in GRU late, we had
very little time to pick up luggage and carry it ourselves to Air Canada. Star Alliance
better watch it before accepting TAM into the family --the staff are trained to somewhere
around elementary school level.
|
|
|
If you experience any problems submitting comments on the above link, please use our general Feedback Page |
|
|
|