|
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer Reviews and TAM Airlines Passenger Trip Reports
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 20 March 2012 by M Souza (Spain) |
| Rating : 8/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
London-Sao Paulo-Madrid. London-Sao Paulo: Brand new 777, very clean. Seat configuration 3-4-3 in main
cabin is uncomfortable. Flight attendants were very polite and helpful. Food was OK, nothing special. Sao
Paulo-Madrid: Sao Paulo airport is very crowded, I queued 40 minutes to check-in. Airbus A330, not so new,
clean. Flight attendants were OK, most don't speak Spanish. Entertainment system only had two movies in
Spanish.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 15 March 2012 by J Bastos (Brazil) |
| Rating : 4/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
CGH-SJP. Sad to see how standards have deteriorated lately. Check-in was convenient, boarding on time.
Seats on the A319 were so thin and hard that I was happy the flight was short. Crew were correct, nothing
special. Take off 20 minutes late but not TAM's fault. Typical full cost low service airline.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 12 March 2012 by Rogerio Almeida (Brazil) |
| Rating : 3/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
Very poor leg room, seats not reclining correctly or broken. Bad or no food. Delays. Staff in general are
friendly. The low level of service is a standard here in Brazil. Depending on flight, there is some
entertainment system however no headsets are provided.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 28 February 2012 by Jason Burnie (UK) |
| Rating : 7/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
LHR-GIG on A330. Outbound departure on time. Pre-departure drink, although just water, was provided.
Amenities kit given. FA were professional and polite and attentive to call bells. Legroom and seat width were
at par to other European carriers' long haul aircraft's. Entertainment system was ok, better than nothing.
Food presentation looked cheap and the quality was somewhat only for filling up your stomach. Inbound
pretty much the same experience, food slightly more edible. Baggage on the carousel in good time both
ways.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 22 February 2012 by D Chan (Canada) |
| Rating : 2/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Business |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
EZE-GRU on A320. Star Alliance Gold flying business class. It took 30 mins to complete check-in process.
No priority queue for security and immigration. No priority boarding for Star Gold and business class
passengers. Flight departed 20 mins late without explanation. Combined drink and meal service began 1
hour after take off and service was very slow. The meal was okay and quantity sufficient. Pillow and blanket
provided. Cabin was somewhat worn but otherwise clean and everything working. No IFE though. FA did not
come around again for the remainder of the flight. FA spoke very limited English. On arrival, checked
baggage delivery was very slow and my priority tagged bags did not come off first. Overall, a below average
flight.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 21 February 2012 by Richard Beaumont (Spain) |
| Rating : 2/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
London Heathrow to Santiago Chile. Very little leg room, seats rock hard. Cabin crew were down right
apathetic if not rude, I speak good Spanish and would have thought at least Spanish speaking cabin crew,
they only spoke Brazilian. The safety video was in Brazilian and aimed at kids, it was in other languages but
the sound was so bad. Mobiles were not switched off on take off and landing, cabin crew did not check
everyone was strapped in. The worst airline I have come across.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 14 February 2012 by D Freitas (Portugal) |
| Rating : 2/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Business |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
JFK-GRU on B777 business class. In GRU, the VIP lounge is well used, and only has 3 bathrooms which is
insufficient, causing queues at times. There is only one shower room which is not enough in comparison to
the number of passengers. On boarding we were met by a rude, impolite crew. The seat is comfortable but
not full flat. The entertainment system is fair and works well. Overall a poor experience.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 13 February 2012 by C Jo (South Korea) |
| Rating : 5/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
JFK-GIG-GRU-JFK. I checked in through business class check-in entitled to star alliance gold member, however
it still took me more than 15 min just waiting for check-in. Boarding was messy with no particular order. Seat
was tiny and recline as bad as US airlines. Attendants hardly understand English and the seat monitor was
tiny with very limited channels. Return trip even worse even though it was same old A330. Other than good
value I would not fly with them.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 30 January 2012 by N Junzo (Brazil) |
| Rating : 4/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
GRU-NAT roundtrip, with connection at GIG in return leg. Planes were A320, poor legroom already default for
this airline. No onboard entertainment on both GRU-NAT (almost a 4-hour flight) and NAT-GIG (3 hour-flight)
routes. No announcements in English, except in GIG-GRU leg. Free drinks and snacks, despite the low-cost
service level.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 11 January 2012 by Richard Winger (USA) |
| Rating : 2/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Business |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
JFK–GIG–MAO–MIA in J class. Seats are outdated, ground service poor and the domestic leg was awful. JFK to
GIG on an A330 with a seat they call lie flat but actually is a sort of recliner where the backrest slides down
but remains curved. Staff friendly, food ok, wine choices inspired and champagne a nice touch. Returning,
check-in at Manaus took over half an hour (only two agents on duty for a full 767) and another half an hour
for security where there was no fast track. There was no lounge but after an hour standing in line it was close
to boarding anyway. The 767 from Manaus has old-style recliners and ancient main screen IFE which is
irritating if trying to read. There is no menu, lunch arrived two hours after a 2pm departure and was awful.
The four hour flight from Rio to Manaus is on a run down A320, cattle class throughout, with poor seat pitch.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 11 January 2012 by Rodrigo Rosato (Brasil) |
| Rating : 5/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
São Paulo GRU to Porto Alegre domestic flight. Delayed 1.5 hrs due unpredicted maintenance. The plane was
replaced by a smaller model that did not have many reserved seats, mine included. Was seated in vacant
seat without a problem. Staff were nice and helpful. Snack of mixed nuts with premium quality beer, soda or
juice. Little for a lunchtime flight. I was pleased, but not amazed - still much better than most Brazilian
carriers. Flight arrived with one hour delay.
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 9 January 2012 by E Moli (UK) |
| Rating : 7/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
Flew from Rio back to London Dec 2011. Aircraft was the A330, which was spotless and staff could not be
faulted, they were in attendance for the whole duration. Drinks rounds were common place, sweets, hot
towels offered. Only down side, is the cattle barn they call a terminal in Rio!
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 12 December 2011 by A Pessuto (UK) |
| Rating : 2/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
I am from Brazil, and live in the UK, so use TAM almost every year. Although the service is reasonable, there
is always something to be desired. I book my flights well in advance, leaving enough time for connections,
usually closer to the time they simply change the times, making the connections rather challenging. In the
last episode, TAM changed the flight times in such a way that it left me with under 2 hours to connect.
Anyone who has been to Brazil before will know that this is impractical as you need to go through
immigration at the first international airport you land before proceeding to the domestic connection. We were
stuck in long queues at immigration, and long queues at the check-in desk to board the connection flight.
TAM did absolutely nothing to prioritise us, knowing we would be late. In fact, TAM simply told us to remain
in the queue, and, believe me, everyone from that flight which needed to catch the onward flight
"conveniently" missed the flight. We were then accommodated to the next flight, which had a stop-over on
the way, and we left inside the aircraft parked by the gates for over two hours! In summary, what was meant
to be a very smooth flight turned out to be a nightmare, with a total delay of 2.5 hours. Not great when you
have toddlers with you!
|
|
TAM Airlines Customer review : 6 December 2011 by L Scazufca (Brazil) |
| Rating : 8/10 |
 |
Cabin Flown | Economy |
Value for Money |  |
Seat Comfort |  |
Staff Service |  |
Catering |  |
Entertainment |  |
Recommended |  |
|
I flew on an Airbus A321 from Brasilia to Fortaleza, the aircraft is pretty good, the space is fair but small. We
all had power outlets on our seats, and could use our mobiles in cruise flight. The food they gave us was a
gilled cheese. The entertainment was good, not great, because we had shared TV's. The "reclining" seats
were comfortable, and the crew was kind.
|
|
|
|
If you experience any problems submitting comments on the above link, please use our general Feedback Page |
|
|
|

back to top
|
Home
|
Airline Opinions |
Legal Notice |
Airline Ranking
|
Airport Ranking
|
Advertise
|
Passenger's Choice Awards
|
Site Map
|
Contact Us
|
Links |
© 1999-2013 Copyright Skytrax
|