|
|
|
TAM AIRLINES Customer Reviews and Passenger Trip Reports |
|
|
|
|
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 7 January 2010 by Rainer Hartmann (Brazil)
| |
Trip Rating : 4/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
Flew round-trip GRU-SCL. Outgoing flight a 777. OK in-flight entertainment. Check-in on time
but flight was delayed one and a half hour waiting for some passengers from a connecting
flight. This is the second time I fly TAM on this route and the second time this type of delay
happens. Would be easier for company to reschedule this or the connecting flight. Flew two
times with LAN with no delays. On board meal was very basic breakfast, OK for four-hour flight
(but not for five and a half hours inside the plane). Return flight left and arrived on time,
but was on an aging A320. Worn overall look. Meal trays were hard to slide back and forth,
lavatory light show occupied when in fact free. I do not recommend flying on this aircraft on
this route.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 3 January 2010 by Jan Nilsen (Norway)
| |
Trip Rating : 3/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
Rio to Belem return. Terrible experience, 2 hours in-line for check-in in Rio, our confirmed
seats (2 adults and 3 kids) was cancelled and all 5 was put in different seat rows - from 2 to
26. Same on the return flight, gate change announced in Portuguese only - we almost missed
the flight. No priority for small children. Flight to Rio took 9h due to landing (fuel stop)
at alternative airport due to weather conditions in Rio. For the last 5 hours onboard the
aircraft we were served one glass of water only. Unless TAM get their act together, I will not
recommend this airline for any flights that last for more that 1-2hrs. TAM is far from being
up to Star Alliance standards, other alliances might more appropriate.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 31 December 2009 by A Attaran (Canada)
| |
Trip Rating : 1/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
YOW to AJU (via GRU) and BSB to YOW (via GRU). Two international flights between Canada and
Brazil, with internal legs. TAM was appalling. TAM transfer desk in GRU had lines stretching
several hours, such that many people missed their connecting flights. We barely made our
flight, but our bags did not. Later, when we needed to change the date of a return ticket,
TAM said it was unable to do so by phone because of a "system change". We were told to go to
the airport ticket desk, where again we found long lines and poorly trained staff who spoke no
English or French. It took four hours of waiting at the TAM desk in Brasilia to change a
flight date - an operation that should take only 10 minutes. TAM staff told us the delay was
normal. It appears the problem is unique to TAM, since none of the other Brazilian carriers
had such long lines that we ever saw.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 27 November 2009 by Phillip Hartland (UK)
| |
Trip Rating : 8/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
Heathrow-Sao Paulo-Buenos Aires. Check in excellent. Plane very clean. Entertainment with a
good selection of films. Seating average, not comfortable for long distance. Service
excellent, food average. Luggage - Fantastic, I took one large holdall and a bicycle boxed up.
and they were the first two pieces of luggage on the carousel in Buenos Aires. Both undamaged and unopened.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 15 November 2009 by Patrice Robitaille (USA)
| |
Trip Rating : 6/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
I had no problems with the flight from Sao Paulo to Salvador, and expect the rest of my
flights on this trip (all on TAM) to be comfortable, assuming that my seat isn't given away.
I am writing to comment about the Brazilian "confirmation" system. For years I have had to
call an airline in Brazil to confirm my reservation the night before I leave. I already made
the reservation, so why should I have to so that my seat isn't given away? Furthermore, the
experience today has been nothing but annoying. The number I tried calling tonight gave (too
fast) an alternative number (in Portuguese -I speak well enough but I am not able to have the message repeat).
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 4 November 2009 by S Koenig (USA)
| |
Trip Rating : 7/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
Fortaleza-Manaus on A320 and Manaus-Miami on Boeing 767. Both flights okay, nothing special.
B767 appeared to be older, no individual seatback video screens, just one lousy film shown to everyone.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 4 November 2009 by A Ibrahim (USA)
| |
Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
JFK to GRU was fantastic, nice meals clean and new aircraft. Entertainment was better than US
carriers. But what impressed me was the service provided by the crew - helpful and even
provided last minute support for my mother who had not booked for special services on and off
the plane. The flight back to JFK was just as enjoyable.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 4 November 2009 by John Sinclair (UK)
| |
Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
GRU-SCL-GRU Enjoyed the flight very much. B777-300, good entertainment and food was very tasty
and plenty of drinks. Tam crew is probably the best in the Americas when it comes to onboard
treatment. My son was given a complimentary kids kit with a flight certificate - occupied him
for the whole flight.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 29 October 2009 by A Hijmans (Brazil)
| |
Trip Rating : 6/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
GRU-SSA on A321, economy. Not the best TAM flight I've had though this was mainly due to
inconsiderate passengers. Tasteless hot sandwich served, two drinks rounds. Flight left and
arrived on time. For some reason we were bussed to arrivals at SSA which almost never happens.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 24 October 2009 by J House (UK)
| |
Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
LHR-GRU Economy. Excellent service by polite and helpful staff on both legs. The food was
top notch compared with normal economy standard, drinks were plentiful and aircraft was a new
777-300ER.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 19 October 2009 by Paul Gay (UAE)
| |
Trip Rating : 1/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
London to Rio and back again, via Sao Paulo. The flight back was delayed by 4 hours. TAM staff
were unhelpful, rude, inconsiderate. Departure that should have been around midnight ended up
around 4am. The waiting area seating had metal armrests so could not be used to lie flat, so
passengers ended up sleeping on the concrete floor. TAM staff refused all requests to obtain
some blankets or anything else to make passengers more comfortable, even though the airport
was quiet at this time and the staff were just standing around chatting and doing nothing.
Worst of all, TAM staff denied all knowledge of their obligations under European law (the
flight was to a European destination so is covered) and said that if the flight was cancelled
we'd be put on the flight one day later but they would not provide any hotel accommodation or
compensation. They also said if we wish to use the phone or internet to contact family
regarding the delay, we'd have to pay to use the business centre. The ground staff insisted
they were only bound by Brazilian law, which basically grants passengers virtually no rights
from what they seemed to be telling us. I will go to Brazil again but will definitely avoid
TAM at all costs.
TAM AIRLINES customer review : 13 October 2009 by A Hijmans (Brazil)
| |
Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
Recommended: |
 |
Value for Money: |
 |
Cabin Flown: | Economy |
SSA-GRU on A321, GRU-LHR on Boeing 777-300, both in economy. No complaints at all. Both
flights on time, efficient boarding procedure for very full intercontinental flight, good
standards of service. IFE fairly good; food a little on the unimaginative side this time (I've
seen much better on TAM.)
|
|
|
If you experience any problems submitting comments on the above link, please use our general Feedback Page |
|
|
|