|
|
|
SAS Scandinavian Airlines Customer Reviews and Passenger Trip Reports |
|
|
|
|
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 1 February 2009 : by T Neyrinck
| Trip Rating : 5/10 |
 |
ARL-CPH-BRU, first leg on MD82 and second on A321, Economy both times. SAS in no frills, very
basic, but the planes left/arrived on time. Clean airplane, FAs do their job and nothing more.
Food and drinks are not free, and choice is very limited. I'd say SAS is okay for 1hr flights,
but the cheerless atmosphere of the planes together with the severe FAs do not encourage me to
fly them again unless there is no alternative.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 1 February 2009 : by Erik Nilsson
| Trip Rating : 7/10 |
 |
BKK-ARN. Lovely quiet plane (A343), decent seat, good service. But, the IFE is in desperate
need of update.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 21 January 2009 : by S Wilson
| Trip Rating : 5/10 |
 |
BKK-CPH in business. Late departure using BKK Royal Silk Lounge, comfortable but busy.
Angled lie flat seat reasonably comfortable, but inferior to others with inflexible headrest.
Noise on A340 noticeable, with constant whine from engines when lying flat. IFE atrocious,
handful of choices on AVOD, fortunately all night flight meant sleep not movies. Crew service
excellent and helpful, but food wasn't special. Dry overcooked fish for supper, breakfast in
the morning was adequate at best. Overall a three star experience, doesn't come close to the
likes of SQ, BA, NZ or VS, TG or LH. Great crew let down by substandard seat, poor catering
and appalling IFE.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 13 December 2008 : by Simon Banister
| Trip Rating : 7/10 |
 |
Economy LHR-ARN return. I was pleasantly surprised with spaciousness of MD82. The crew were very
friendly. I was a little shocked I had to pay SEK20 for a cup of coffee, but it did include a refill
and a bit of chocolate!
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 13 December 2008 : by P Ameil
| Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
LHR to ARL return. Both flights on time, outbound on Boeing 737-600, return MD81 or MD82 (not sure
which as the safety instructions card was valid for both types). Didn't buy anything on board, but
noticed on outward flight that anybody who bought a hot drink was offered 1, if not 2, refills.
Staff seem to be more mature than other airlines but pleasant enough. Return flight to LHR I had a
row of 3 seats to myself, and from getting off the plane to waiting on the platform for the Heathrow
Express took a little over 20 minutes - and I had hold baggage! It was nice to be allowed to board
the plane at least 30 minutes before departure rather than the usual scrum from the low cost
carriers.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 11 December 2008 : by H Moeller
| Trip Rating : 9/10 |
 |
I must be a very unusual customer because everyone else seems to be mostly concerned with the price
of food. In fairness, I do get annoyed when I am asked to pay for my early morning Diet Coke on a
domestic flight in Norway whilst I can have a breakfast with cereal and hot rolls and a cup of tea
for free. I do not want yoghurt and brown cheese on toast, I would like a Diet Coke. There is no
business class within Norway and there are some rather annoying variations in the standard of
service between the Scandinavian countries. For some reason, on-board service always is slightly
better on routes that do not start or terminate in Copenhagen (although that is the airline's main
hub!). In my experience, SAS tends to almost always be on time, often early. Fast track security,
internet check-in and seat selection works a treat. The long-haul Airbus fleet has good IFE, sleeper
seats in business class and good food - not outstanding, but better than average. In Europe, I
prefer the good old MD-80s to the more modern types. If you are seated towards the front of the
cabin, you will not find a quieter, more comfortable, spacious and pleasant plane.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 30 November 2008 : by Joerg Lehnert
| Trip Rating : 2/10 |
 |
Scandinavian Airlines from Copenhagen to Berlin (TXL). Flight was operated by Cimber Air. Plane was
a turbopropp ATR 42. Flight was about one hour. On short and medium haul flights SAS has become a
low service airlines where all on board service has to be paid extra. SAS is no longer a quality
airline.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 24 November 2008 : by B Vincent
| Trip Rating : 7/10 |
 |
I took several domestic and regional flights with Scandinavian in November - TOS-LYR, LYR-TOS, TOS-
OSL, ARN-OSL and OSL-KEF. Fares when purchased in advance very reasonable.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 21 January 2009 : by S Wilson
| Trip Rating : 5/10 |
 |
BKK-CPH in business. Late departure using BKK Royal Silk Lounge, comfortable but busy.
Angled lie flat seat reasonably comfortable, but inferior to others with inflexible headrest.
Noise on A340 noticeable, with constant whine from engines when lying flat. IFE atrocious,
handful of choices on AVOD, fortunately all night flight meant sleep not movies. Crew service
excellent and helpful, but food wasn't special. Dry overcooked fish for supper, breakfast in
the morning was adequate at best. Overall a three star experience, doesn't come close to the
likes of SQ, BA, NZ or VS, TG or LH. Great crew let down by substandard seat, poor catering
and appalling IFE.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 11 November 2008 : by Alan Mackenzie
| Trip Rating : 8/10 |
 |
Rome (FCO) to Copenhagen, having tried Airone CPH-FCO. A professional service, from web check in to
deplaning. You are treated with courtesy without it being apparent. Nice clean aircraft with no
broken bits and bobs.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 21 October 2008 : by T Mahr
| Trip Rating : 6/10 |
 |
MUC-CPH-HEL in Economy booked at very short notice and at great price (about a third) compared to
AY/LH. Both flights on time with an easy transfer in Copenhagen. Still no free service on board SAS
flights in Economy with hefty prices for buy on board. Planes rather grumpy and old as the cabin
crew. Will nevertheless fly again given the great price and the besides the service onboard painless
flights and transfer in CPH.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 18 October 2008 : by C Halvorsen
|
Customer Rating : 4/5 |  |
NUE-CPH-OSL-MOL in Economy Extra. I consider SAS one of the better airlines for intercontinental
travel - in Europe they are more midfield. In Economy you have to pay for food and bev - except the
breakfast in Norway, which is free, as is coffee or tea. But as I travel on a flexible economy
ticket, I end up in economy extra, which doesn't offer much extra on board, mind (apart from free
food and champagne if you should be so inclined). But the fast track security at Oslo and Copenhagen
works really well. Canadair Jet between NUE and CPH (Cimber Air) was a bit scruffy and the flight
attendants were not overly friendly, but polite. I find the Norwegian attendants to be the most
helpful, but there seems to be fewer and fewer of them on the long-haul routes out of CPH and ARN.
Airbus A321 to Oslo and Boeing 737-600 to MOL, both with ample legroom. No overhead screens on the
Boeing though. Decent cold meals on international flights. All flights on time - and when the gate
changed at OSL, I even got a text message to my mobile informing me of the change and wishing me a
pleasant flight, which I thought was a nice touch.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 16 October 2008 : by Stephen D'Arcy
|
Customer Rating : 4/5 |  |
Brussels - Copenhagen, economy return. Pre-flight check-in saved time and stress for my 07.00 flight
and 06.30 check-in. FAs good, plane clean and comfortable; same for the return. SAS offer no "free"
extras such as food and drink, this was only a 90-minute flight. This was my first experience of SAS
- would use them again if they can keep fares comparable with Sterling and Brussels Airlines.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 14 October 2008 : by Per Kop
|
Customer Rating : 2/5 |  |
Extremely expensive and the quality of the service is below average. On European routes you don't
even get a glass of water if you travel economy. And everything starts with the poor professional
skills of the flight attendants. If you want to travel business, forget about it. No difference in
regard to the seat comfort, except that the middle seat is not occupied. Food is not great (just
regular economy food type on other airline). If you have other choice, go for another airline!
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 2 October 2008 : by J Decety
|
Customer Rating : 3/5 |  |
ORD-CPH-CDG on Business class. The business lounge in terminal 5 at O'Hare is way better than the
Red Carpet club in other terminals. Unfortunately, there is no free-access Internet service.
Boarding the A340 was fast and we left O'Hare on time. Service onboard is professional, food okay.
The seats (do not recline flat) are not really comfortable and do not match other business class
seats such as on Air France, Lufthansa, BA. You keep sliding down and can't get a good sleep.
Copenhagen is one of my favorite airports. The flight to Paris was on time. The seat is the same as
in economy! I was out of Charles de Gaulle airport in minutes and found my was easily to the TGV
station. Altogether a pleasant trip, but quite disappointed by the comfort of the seat.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 29 September 2008 : by J Berge
|
Customer Rating : 1/5 |  |
It is amazing to experience the lack of generosity on this airline. Even if you pay a substantial
price, you have to pay for water, wine, food, everything. Even when you travel from Oslo to for
instance Madrid. Is it really possible to be so economical? I travel business class internally in
Norway (I need flexible tickets), and the tickets cost a fortune - even then I have to pay just to
get some food at all! And the food is terrible. Worst airline - stay away,
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 25 September 2008 : by Alf Larsson
|
Customer Rating : 4/5 |  |
ARN-AMSin C-class. It was a new and better service than earlier. Selection of three kind of hot
food. Good wine served from "big bottles". Service very good.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 16 September 2008 : by L Reinstein
|
Customer Rating : 3/5 |  |
MUC-CPH. C Class. MUC LH Business Lounge average with a middling array of afternoon snacks. No
preferred boarding. Old MD-82 plane. Service attentive FA's with decent two course cold meal that
should have been hot for time of evening. Nothing wrong here, but nothing special either.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 15 September 2008 : by Francisco Pinyata
|
Customer Rating : 3/5 |  |
I never travel with SAS Braathens all the way to my ultimate destination. I always fly with them
just to get to the airport elsewhere in Europe that handles larger aircraft than those flying from
Oslo Gardemoen. SAS Braathens scores mediocre on almost every aspect of flying. Average service,
average seats, average food selection (which you most likely have to pay for). But one thing stands
out that this airline could improve on is punctuality. Almost every flight I've been with them was
delayed one way or another. They don't even bother announcing the reason for the setback - they just
tell you at the gate that wherever you're going - you'll be late. My last flight with them from
Amsterdam to Oslo, the flight was delayed for over 2 hours and they didn't even offer any kind of
snacks or refreshments. I'm complaining because they're not classified as a budget carrier. On a
lighter note, they have the best coffee in the sky - now, let's figure out how to make the flight
attendants refill your cup more often.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 6 September 2008 : by K Hansen
|
Customer Rating : 3/5 |  |
Copenhagen - Beijing in Economy Extra: Four rows of Economy Extra are placed between Economy and
Business Class on SAS Airbus 340. They go for around EUR 2000 for a roundtrip to Beijing, while the
real deal in Biz cost you another 1000-1500 Euro. Economy Extra is considerably cheaper than C-
class, but you will be sitting with the curtain right in front of you separating you from the luxury
onboard (but no curtain will separate you from normal economy), so the message from the airline is
clear - Don’t expect Business Class! In Economy Extra they have removed one seat in each row
compared to normal Economy and made the seat a little wider. So you will be sitting 2-3-2 instead of
2-4-2. It does make a difference and if you get row 14 you will have heaps of legroom. The perks are
not so great, however. Free alcohol, a choice between two menus, metal cutlery, real glasses, and a
small amenity kit. Nowadays you pay for your wine and beer in SAS Economy, but in Extra it’s still
free like it used to be in Economy a few years ago. Then again, if I flew Cathay Pacific, Singapore
Airlines or Lufthansa I wouldn’t have to think about this at all, as they all serve it for free in
Economy. The same thing applies to the meals. In SAS Economy Extra you get a choice between two
meals – ordinary Economy Class meals, however – but you do get the choice after all. In Economy, you
don’t. Again, Cathay will give you three main course choices in normal Economy. You will also get a
small amenity kit with a shoe bag, toothbrush, shades and earplugs. You will get almost the same
thing – except for the shoe bag – on a normal Singapore Airlines long haul flight. You will have
Audio & Video On Demand in SAS Economy Extra, but not in normal SAS Economy. Again, other airlines –
like Singapore - treat this to their normal Economy Class passengers, so it doesn’t really feel like
luxury (by mistake, they loaded the movies for the homebound trip on the outbound flight, so the
movies you choose not to see on your way to China because you thought they were crap, well, you
would be watching them on the way back as you would have no other choice...). You will also have a
power connection for your computer in Extra, which is great, except for the fact that mine didn’t
work! So to sum it up, Economy Extra is not pampering luxury, it’s more like ’Economy as it should
be’ or 'as it used to be'. It seems that the worse you make normal Economy the better your Extra
product will look, and that seems to be the case here. SAS will upgrade you at the gate for 10.000
points, which is a good deal, but I wouldn’t fork out an extra EUR 1000 on top of my Economy Class
ticket to sit here. It’s not worth the extra money, but worth the points!
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 2 September 2008 : by Tapani Vuola
|
Customer Rating : 2/5 |  |
HEL-CPH=BCN tourist class. Nothing worked - check-in machine did not recognize the second leg (by
Spanair, the same consortium), the girl at check in suggested that I take the luggage out and re-
check it in CPH, the next leg was overbooked. I lost my luggage, which arrived 32hours later -
inbetween it was impossible to contact the lost luggage office, as they did not answer the phone.
The first flight was with AVRO jet, very cramped, but friendly and professional crew. The second leg
with Airbus 320 - sandwiches for sale, but did not accept credit cards. Too many "incidents" for one
consortium in one day. Cannot recommend.
SAS SCANDINAVIAN review : 2 September 2008 : by G Thomas
|
Customer Rating : 3/5 |  |
Beijing to Stockholm. A reasonable flight but the inflight entertainment was pretty poor - lots of
the films on offer were very old and just played on a loop. Since all the films were of different
lengths you ended up watching bits of different films. Airlines such as Emirates are streets ahead
in this respect. Staff fine, although I didn't have much need to call on them. Stockholm to London.
Very disappointed that not even a complimentary cup of tea was offered - all refreshments had to be
paid for. Not what I expect on a non-budget airline.
|
Earlier comments for SAS Scandinavian have been archived (ie. prior to date of last comment above).
|
|
|
|
If you experience any problems submitting comments on the above link, please use our general Feedback Page |
|
|
|