|
Dallas Love Field Airport review by M Smith
19 March 2008 Customer Rating : 
Living in Dallas, there is no comparison between Love field and DFW. Love field is much quicker and
efficient. It may not be as glossy, but the chances of getting out on time are much much better.
Also, I have had flights cancelled at DFW that were never posted on the board. A couple times I
waited a couple hours, then was told at the gate when I went to check in that the flight was cancelled.
Dallas Love Field Airport review by Matt Ray
30 January 2008 Customer Rating : 
Great little airport. So convenient to the heart of Dallas, you are in and out in a flash. Nothing
like the behemoth that is DFW. DFW has nice facilities, which Dallas Love does not have, but you
won't be hanging out there long enough to need them, chances are. They do have decent places to
eat, so you are covered there, just don't expect to go on some shopping spree.
Dallas Love Field Airport review by Mike Weber
20 September 2007 Customer Rating : 
This airport is great for a quick get in and get out, as the gates are relatively close together on
the Southwest side of the airport. Not much in the way of shops and restaurants, but this airport
isn't really designed for that kind of traffic. It's probably going to have to go through some
changes, and cleaning as they start adding more flights.
Dallas Love Field Airport review by Gregg Hillier
10 June 2006 Customer Rating : n/a
I flew into Love Field recently and it is very much "A Tale of Two
Airports." The Main Concourse where Southwest Operates has adequete food
and shopping but it looks and smells like a Greyhound Terminal circa
1970. Security lines are long and slow, much worse than DFW. The 3 new
AA Gates in the old Braniff East Concourse are great - very clean and
comfortable but quite a long walk from the Main Hall. AA built the new
area in 2001 when it was competing with Legend's long-haul premium
service from Love, but never opened it when they pulled out of Love
after 9/11. Easing the Wright Amendment forced AA back in to compete
with Southwest on 4 high-volume routes. If you have cause to fly to/from
Austin, Kansas City, St Louis, or San Antonio out of Love, use AA's
gates.
Dallas Love Field Airport review by David Guenthner
8 April 2006
A regional airport used predominantly for low-fare, high-frequency
service in the South Central United States. It is much smaller and much
closer to downtown than DFW. The central terminal is old and not seen
much in the way of updates. The security was fairly efficient on a
Sunday but I can see where it would be problematic during the week. The
concourses desperately need work. Southwest is the predominant carrier
here and its concourse is congested, stuffy, and drab. Lounge areas are
worn and the TVs barely work. Continental uses two gates close to the
central terminal that ought to be condemned. American just recently
opened three gates at the far end of the east concourse, and when I say
far, I mean far. By the time I got to the last American gate, I was
almost too tired to walk back to the terminal. They spent a lot of
money to make a clean and comfortable gate complex, and it was
completely empty.
IMPORTANT NOTE
Comments and opinions contained in these pages do not represent the views of Skytrax. All features contain unsolicited input from site visitors, and we
seek to exercise the minimum level of editorial control and censorship to ensure the widest debate and platform for customer opinions. We
will not publish submissions that contain abusive language. We cannot guarantee to publish all opinions submitted.
ADD YOUR COMMENTS HERE
These Review pages are designed to offer guidance and assistance to other travellers, and we ask
respondents to use an "informative" style of comment and share any travel tips for the airport in question.
Your First Name (or initial) and Family Name, and E-mail address MUST be supplied.
When submitting comments, please DO NOT insert paragraphs.
Please check you use Upper and Lower case only - submissions made all in CAPITALS will
NOT be accepted.
Comment submissions that require extensive text editing CANNOT be published.
|