CHICAGO O'HARE AIRPORT review : 27 June 2008 : by A Turek
|
Customer Rating : n/a |  |
It may look like a vision of hell but it got the job done. Arrived from Heathrow on Virgin Atlantic;
Immigration done in fifteen minutes; bags ten minutes more; a well-organised taxi rank with no
waiting at all. Coming back security, like Immigration, brusque but efficient. I was glad to have
lounge access but it would have been bearable without.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by S Wilby
23 April 2008 Customer Rating : 
We expected a surly welcome to America and were not disappointed. The immigration officer seemed to
want to provoke an argument with his questions about why we were visiting Chicago and how we could
afford to pay for our visit and with his negative comments about the city - I hope he does not apply
for a post with the Tourist Board. The signage was poor for train transport to the city. The
departure lounges in terminal 5 are disappointing with poor catering facilities once through
security but at least the flight was on time and the baggage recovery on arrival was excellent.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Dave Hay
8 January 2008 Customer Rating : 
It's the worst ever airport I have been to. The passport control took over 1 hour to go through,
having only 3 people to check International passports for thousands that were passing thru' -
welcome to America! Why aren't the airlines doing something to correct this problem - they had to
deal with the mess off missed flights, due to poor passport control.Good luck travellers!
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by S Srinivasan
24 December 2007 Customer Rating : 
I've never had too many problems connecting through ORD. There are dedicated security lines for
First/Business/elite FFs, and those lines are never very long. At least in T3, there are a fair
number of shops and restaurants to choose from, and the AA Admirals Club is conveniently located
between Concourses H and K, so you have an easy walk to your gate. I've also never had to wait more
than 5-10 minutes at immigration, though granted, the flight I use from DEL comes in very early in
the morning when there aren't any other flights around. The main complaint I have about ORD is the
utter lack of information concerning delays, at least for AA flights. Flights are often shown as
on-time, right up to the scheduled boarding time, at which point a delay magically appears, with no
explanation given by the ground staff. I guess they don't see the need anymore, given the chronic
delays that plague ORD these days. Overall, though, there are far worse places to transit through.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Frank Sherwin
12 November 2007 Customer Rating : 
I had the misfortune to connect at O'Hare airport en route from San Jose to Copenhagen. It was my
first time in Chicago, and my considered impression is that O'Hare is a breathtakingly unfriendly
place. From virtually the moment of disembarking where arriving and transiting passengers were
prevented from leaving, having to side-step high-fiving security types and obnoxious passport controls
(please and thank you obviously never made it this far into the mid-West), navigating the terminals
(gate M11 is in terminal 5, that's perfectly clear then), until the dingy airside international
departure lounge with it's roped-shut kiosks and virtually complete lack of facilities... it was an
abysmal experience.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by D Pavlovic
5 October 2007 Customer Rating : 
Recently flew twice to Chicago, FRA-ORD-MSN and MUC-ORD-MSN, had absolutely no problems with
immigration, although there were other flights, arrived at the same time to T5. I would say it just
depends on a situation. Had no problems with re-checking my luggage for my connection flight or
changing between T5 and T1. There was a queue at the T1 security check, but it moved relatively fast.
I consider one of the biggest ORD problems delays and changing of gates - my flight to MSN was
delayed, then the delay was shortened, than again increased, then again shortened and so on - gates
were being changed three times, people were going crazy. Going back to FRA and MUC, respectively, was
nice and smooth. In general, I find it very good and have no complains.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Mark Simons
20 April 2007 Customer Rating : n/a
If you have time in connecting , avoid the cramped conditions and queues
to eat in the domestic terminals and head for the Hilton - which can be
reached by foot. Here there are a choice of a very nice Italian
restaurant or a sports bar + if feeling energetic you can also access
the Hilton fitness club for ten dollars and have a swim, sauna or
workout. It really is worth the detour if you have a couple of hours
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Martyn Rogers
25 November 2006
Arrived from LHR into terminal 5 and after walking into the immigration
area discovered it was virtually empty. Maybe we were just lucky or
there are no other international flights arriving around this time
(1315) but we were through immigration within 10 mins. Staff took
fingerprints, photograph and were on our way, no grilling - just smiles!
Flying back from O'Hare, check in was smooth and efficient. As flying
business class were able to use the fast track immigration queue, took
around 10-15 mins to pass through, once airside was impressed how modern
and clean the airport was. Plenty of choice for places to eat/drink,
duty free was rather basic but adequate. Overall a very pleassnt
experience and a much better one than a visit to Orlando Intl 3 years
ago.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Jason Lawley
15 November 2006
Arriving into the US after a long transatlantic flight to be greeted by
the longest looking Immigration queue of all time is not the best start
to a visit to the US (four flights arriving at the same time from Asia
and Europe). Non-US citizens queue took 1h 30 mins to get through and in
this time, the security staff walk around like prison guards checking
that not a single person dare use their cellphone until after
immigration. Immigration officers treat you as if you are a possible
suspect with questioning and attitude not found at any other airport or
country worldwide. Check-in areas are however relatively pleasant -
numerous self check-in machines (for United Airlines anyway) in the US-
domestic area and security not a problem if you have a Star Alliance
Gold/Silver card for instance as there is an express lane for such
holders which was a nice surprise. Flight expected departure time
updates for both domestic and international flights was found to be
largely erratic - if the flight is on-time then the gate/time info is
fine, but if your flight is delayed, low betide if you can get any
accurate info on where you should go and how long you will be waiting
for. For several ORD-LHR flights that I have taken over the past few
months, majority have been delayed and the new departure time has almost
never been provided, nor has gate info. Meant that pax were wandering
around not having a clue whether the flight is cancelled/delayed etc and
airport customer services queues were perhaps 30 mins long if you wanted
to go find out.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Prakash Kotagal
7 November 2006
Now that water bottles are not allowed to be carried through security,
guess what has happened to the price of a bottle of water? I had to pay
$2.75 for a small bottle because the water fountain adjacent to gate E8
was broken (and has been broken for quite a while). I would like to know
what O'Hare airport authorities are doing about this. I am all for a
market economy, etc. but this is too much to pay for water! A little bit
of oversight by the airport authorities would be welcome and much
appreciated by travelers.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Steve Maier
15 October 2006
MUC-ORD-CVG. I had a satisfactory experience in ORD. From landing of the
aircraft (Lufthansa) to arrival at the nice Red Carpet Lounge of United
(comfy, new and well equipped) in terminal 2 took me only 50 minutes.
The Terminal where we arrived was relatively new, yes the way from the
plane to immigrations was awfully long, but still shorter than in
Shanghai. Immigration was efficient, even if it was rush hour it took me
only 15 minutes to go through. Took train to terminal 2 and after a
couple of minutes I was airside. I have no complaints, will consider
flying through Chicago again.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Javier Urra
8 September 2006
MAD-ORD with Iberia. If possible, avoid Chicago airport. immigration
lines for non American are simply endless and when you finally exit, you
will find no indication about baggage claim belt. On the contrary, it is
likely to find airport staff gathering suitcases in some corner or even
worse, taking suitcases to "somewhere". My baggage was completely
unattended, pretty far from the belt, and I did not find my second
baggage until 6 days later, completely destroyed. Dirty, old style and
feeling guilty just for asking "Where is the Madrid baggage?" is the
welcome words you will find if arriving to ORD Chicago O Hare
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Ed Fry
23 August 2006
Chicago Airport may not be the most favoured hub to pass through, although it's somewhat
unavoidable, since both United & American (both Heathrow customers...) hub there. T5 is interesting.
Disembarking tired, jetlagged passengers into a grey walled, low-ceiling walkway is not the ideal
way to say "hey welcome to the united states". Immigration has queues no matter what, although our
queuing only lasted 10 minutes. Cheerful customs greeted us with a smile which was nice after
baggage claim and we dropped our bags at the United baggage transfer facility at T5. The train is
harmless, although initially from T5 can b a little full. T1 security is somewhat threatening. A
women who sticks her hand vaguely in your direction and yelps passports (on a domestic flight) is
hardly inviting, and then she scribbles the gate number on our boarding cards ... it's sort of
pointless... I transferred through Chicago 3 times in less than 3 weeks. The bus to E & F (United
Express) gates from C (United) gates is small, and not wheelchair accessable. It's a minbus with
benches all facing inwards. The main C Councourse is rather attractive; it allows plenty of natural
light in and allows good views of the tarmac.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Neil Ramsay
1 June 2006
Arrived mid afternoon at T5 with other aircraft. The foreigner lines at
immigration were extremely long but authorities did their best to open
resident gates when not in use and move overflow to other sections to
reduce the delay. Took an hour to get through which, considering the
crowd, was not too bad. INS agent polite and welcoming. Baggage already
available and customs inspection minimal. United's baggage transfer can
be a bit confusing for the uninitiated but mine has always turned up at
my final destination so there must be a system operating. Train to
Terminal 2 was quick and painless. Security here quick and efficient.
Bad weather earlier in the day had caused considerable flight back up
and eventual cancellations. Terminals were extremely crowded with many
angry and frustrated passengers. Our United agent handled our rebooking
with good grace. Next morning's checkin was a long and a little
frustrating with late arriving passengers with imminent departures
getting preference over those who did the right thing and turned up for
their flights early. Departure gates in T2 were very crowded and
obviously flights had been overbooked with constant requests for
passengers with time on their hands to give up their seats for the
normal compensations. Not the best airport experience but certainly not
the worst.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Richard Allan
29 May 2006
I transited thru ORD recently on a London to Appleton WI return trip.
It's an awful airport. Terminal 5 is shabby with a complete lack of
decent services once thru security. No where to get half-decent food, no
shops or bar so you spend 2 hours just waiting at the gate. Going out
the transfer from BA terminal 5 to United terminal 2 is poor and
confusing. There's uncertainty what to do with your bags, where to get
your new boarding pass etc. All my US colleagues smiled knowingly when I
told them of my frustrations. Airlines using ORD should pressurize them
to upgrade the facilities a bit as I'll be looking for alternative
routes when possible.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Alex Knisely
18 May 2006
The airport facilities have not been re-arranged to take into account
"security" requirements, although 9-11 is several years behind us.
Example: Post-office access (Terminal 2 only) is behind the security
gates. Airports everywhere need to move general-use sites out of the
departing-passenger-only zones; perhaps O'Hare will bear this in mind
when a re-build is contemplated (and, shabby as Terminals 3 and 5 are,
one is needed soon).
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Robert Clark
18 May 2006
When changing airlines through ORD, the place can be a nightmare. My
flight was Alaska Airlines ANC-ORD and United Xpress ORD-CAE. United
and Alaska terminals are very far apart at ORD so you have to cross the
street, use the train to the very last terminal, pick up your ticket, go
through security, and walk down about 20 minutes to finally get to the
xpress gates, which is normally at the end of the United terminal. No
moving sidewalk to help out. Should you find yourself changing airlines
at ORD, get your ticket from ORD to destination at the airport of
origin. (In my case, get my Alaska Airlines ticket, then go to
United/Canada and get the ORD-CAE ticket.) Otherwise you could be
waiting in line at the ticket counter for a very long time. You will
be in the same situation if you are flying to smaller airports in the
northeast or southeast USA.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Jean Coldham
5 March 2006
I fly Internationally out of Terminal 5 at least 5 times a year and am
always amazed at how bad the facilities are at International Departures.
Hardly anywhere to sit - just fast food "restaurants", no shops to speak
of. This is a golden opportunity missed! International travelers have
to spend at least 2 hours in this terminal with nothing decent to eat
and no stores to roam around - not even enough room to sit and wait
comfortably. Once through security there is nothing at all!! The other
terminals, where you only have to wait 1 hour have plenty of amenities.
Also bear in mind that lots of Indians and Pakistani families live in
the Chicago area and when they leave the country the whole family is
there to see them off, so terribly overcrowded!
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by James O'Brien
10 January 2006
I had my first travelling experience through O'Hare over the busy
Christmas period. I have used Midway before and avoid O'Hare because of
things people told me about it. I found O'Hare pleasant place - I landed
at terminal 5 on American Airlines, didn't have to do immigration as it
was done in Dublin. After collecting my bags, clearing customs and
rechecking was out in 20 mins and in terminal 3 for my flight to Toronto
5 mins later. Nice selection of shops, bars and places to eat. Fast
train service between terminals.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Aaron Garrett
16 November 2005
I've flown in and out of Chicago's O'Hare and Midway airports on numerous occasions and O'Hare is so much easier.
On a recent KLM flight to Amsterdam I was impressed on how quickly
we passed through security. Especially considering there were quite a few other airlines checking
in for flights. I was disappointed, however, at the lack of services offered once through security. And my experiences
with O'Hare customs have been pleasant, no long waits. Each terminal has its own security checkpoint, unlike MDW or ATL which are
just a mass of people at one security checkpoint and involve long waits.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Yevheniy Kahanovych
2 November 2005
Great architecture, pleasant structure to look at. The whole place is
telling "come here again", but as to the functionality of the venue, I
have to say some unpleasant words. First, cleanliness of toilets is a
must, not facultative. Second, the fact that trolleys are not allowed at
the transit train between terminals makes transiting painful for
passengers with bags (especially for families). Third, terminals 2 and
3 are not lit enough. In the evening arrivals areas on the ground level
look gloomy. Terminal 1 is not well signposted. If you fly with United
and your departure terminal is #2, you have to check-in at Terminal 1
and then go to Terminal 2 through a special passage for United domestic
passengers. Stupid and terribly confusing for those who fly first time.
I've spent some 20 minutes in Terminal 2 trying to find United check-in
desks among ones of Northwest and Continental, and then somehow guessed
it should be at the Terminal 1. Food I ate at the outlet near the gate
(Terminal 2 airside ) was iedible. Departing from Terminal 5 on British
Airways was a difficult experience. Slow check-in, and nothing to eat
after security at 9pm, but the terminal itself is nice, roomy and
convenient. Arriving with united to the state-of-the-art concourse B of
Terminal 1 was a great pleasure. All in all, great look, poor touch.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Padraic Rowan
24 August 2005
Flew Into ORD with Continental (Terminal 2) in July. The Baggage claim area was very dreary and
the terminal itself was swamped with people. It was like an obstacle course making our way from
the gate to baggage claim! I flew back to Dublin with Aer Lingus via Terminal 5. First
impressions are breathtaking, with its airy check-in area and architecture. The security line
was non-existent, so we got through in 2 minutes! However, once past security, all there is is a
long corridor with the gate after gate. There is absolutely nothing to do. No place to eat, just
rows of chairs. It is a real let down, as other parts of the terminal are so nice. I ended up
having to go back outside to get some food.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Stefan Paetow
12 June 2005
Chicago O'Hare is a mixed opinion here. International Arrivals are fantastic, the
most friendly INS and Customs staff I have ever encountered flying to the US.
Efficient, straight-forward, and just plain good. International Departures is
slightly less nice. Limited seating areas before check-in, NO left luggage facilities
even pre-9/11. Airline check-in is airy and open, and makes life in the queue
bearable. Almost no shops/amenities after going through security control, which is a
real shame. Domestic terminals are a nightmare. United's Terminal has NO information
boards to tell you which terminal and which gate your flight is due to depart at,
staff are rude and unhelpful when you are stranded and where on earth are the
information desks? On the far end of the half-mile terminal? The Skytrain makes
moving from International terminal to domestic terminal easy though.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by A Hilbun
29 June 2005
There is no way around the fact that O'Hare is simply a zoo. The facilities are simply not well
equipped to handle the number of people that pass through it. Terminal 1 security is a nightmare,
even though there are two checkpoints, one at each end of the building. Terminals 1 and 5 are also
starting to look worn, despite the fact that they are relatively new. That said, the airport is
well-maintained and relatively clean, especially in light of the number of people who use the
facility on a daily basis. United now needs to take a cue from Northwest Airlines (who built a new
terminal facility for them and their partners at Detroit Metro) and build a new terminal at O'Hare
that would allow United customers to transit from international to domestic flights in the same
building.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by Mark Taylor
29 June 2005
I'd suggest avoiding O'Hare if you are trying to connect from an international flight to a domestic
one. No fast track for F/J class passengers, no help whatsoever with flight connections. You just
wait in the queue at immigration and take your chances. It's not even logical, they had space at the
US immigration channel so some uniform opened the barrier for people waiting behind me to go
through. One guy tried to join this from near me- probably also had a connection- but aforementioned
jobsworth shooed him back. I can handle the idea of needing extra security but if you, US
immigration, can't find a way within this to accommodate the realities of an international hub, then
come clean and tell people not to try connecting at this or other US airports operating on this
basis- which is many of them I believe. To their credit, the airport and airline staff are pretty
good at managing the situation and getting you on a later flight because they are well used to this
farce, and ashamed of it too. I know LHR immigration is bad but at least there's an effort to get
people to their connection. If this is truly where US government/immigration has arrived at post
9/11, I'm afraid you've conceded a clear victory to the terrorists on this one.
Chicago O'Hare Airport review by A Hilbun
29 June 2005
There is no way around the fact that O'Hare is simply a zoo. I suppose it's difficult to keep such
a busy facility well-maintained, and the airport does a decent job, but the bottom line is that the
facilities are just not well-equipped to handle the sheer number of people that pass through it
daily. Security at Terminal 1 (United) is nightmare, even though there are two checkpoints, one at
each end of the building. United should consider dropping some serious money on a new terminal
building to compete with Northwest's spacious and airy MacNamara Terminal at Detroit not only for
aesthetic reasons, but also so that United customers can transit from international to domestic in
the same building. To say that the current arrangement can be problematic is an understatement.
It's only through luck that up to this point (knock on wood) I haven't missed a connecting domestic
flight out of Terminal 1 after arriving at Terminal 5 (international).
The whole airport is so crowded that it makes me feel claustrophobic, and it's a shame that Terminal
5, brand new ten years ago, now looks so worn. United needs to follow the example of Northwest and
build new facilities for itself before O'Hare gains the reputation that Detroit Metro had prior to
the opening of the MacNamara Terminal.
IMPORTANT NOTE
Comments and opinions contained in these pages do not represent the views of Skytrax. All features contain unsolicited input from site visitors, and we
seek to exercise the minimum level of editorial control and censorship to ensure the widest debate and platform for customer opinions. We
will not publish submissions that contain abusive language. We cannot guarantee to publish all opinions submitted.
ADD YOUR COMMENTS HERE
These Review pages are designed to offer guidance and assistance to other travellers, and we ask
respondents to use an "informative" style of comment and share any travel tips for the airport in question.
Your First Name (or initial) and Family Name, and E-mail address MUST be supplied.
When submitting comments, please DO NOT insert paragraphs.
Please check you use Upper and Lower case only - submissions made all in CAPITALS will
NOT be accepted.
Comment submissions that require extensive text editing CANNOT be published.
|